TEST - Catálogo BURRF
   

Bootstrapping Stationary ARMA-GARCH Models / by Kenichi Shimizu.

Por: Colaborador(es): Tipo de material: TextoTextoEditor: Wiesbaden : Vieweg+Teubner, 2010Descripción: 148 páginas 12 ilustraciones recurso en líneaTipo de contenido:
  • texto
Tipo de medio:
  • computadora
Tipo de portador:
  • recurso en línea
ISBN:
  • 9783834897787
Formatos físicos adicionales: Edición impresa:: Sin títuloClasificación LoC:
  • QA1-939
Recursos en línea:
Contenidos:
Bootstrap Does not Always Work -- Parametric AR(p)-ARCH(q) Models -- Parametric ARMA(p, q)- GARCH(r, s) Models -- Semiparametric AR(p)-ARCH(1) Models.
Resumen: Bootstrap technique is a useful tool for assessing uncertainty in statistical estimation and thus it is widely applied for risk management. Bootstrap is without doubt a promising technique, however, it is not applicable to all time series models. A wrong application could lead to a false decision to take too much risk. Kenichi Shimizu investigates the limit of the two standard bootstrap techniques, the residual and the wild bootstrap, when these are applied to the conditionally heteroscedastic models, such as the ARCH and GARCH models. The author shows that the wild bootstrap usually does not work well when one estimates conditional heteroscedasticity of Engle’s ARCH or Bollerslev’s GARCH models while the residual bootstrap works without problems. Simulation studies from the application of the proposed bootstrap methods are demonstrated together with the theoretical investigation.
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
No hay ítems correspondientes a este registro

Springer eBooks

Bootstrap Does not Always Work -- Parametric AR(p)-ARCH(q) Models -- Parametric ARMA(p, q)- GARCH(r, s) Models -- Semiparametric AR(p)-ARCH(1) Models.

Bootstrap technique is a useful tool for assessing uncertainty in statistical estimation and thus it is widely applied for risk management. Bootstrap is without doubt a promising technique, however, it is not applicable to all time series models. A wrong application could lead to a false decision to take too much risk. Kenichi Shimizu investigates the limit of the two standard bootstrap techniques, the residual and the wild bootstrap, when these are applied to the conditionally heteroscedastic models, such as the ARCH and GARCH models. The author shows that the wild bootstrap usually does not work well when one estimates conditional heteroscedasticity of Engle’s ARCH or Bollerslev’s GARCH models while the residual bootstrap works without problems. Simulation studies from the application of the proposed bootstrap methods are demonstrated together with the theoretical investigation.

Para consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.

Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Secretaría de Extensión y Cultura - Dirección de Bibliotecas @
Soportado en Koha