000 03711nam a22003735i 4500
001 277774
003 MX-SnUAN
005 20160429153833.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150903s2006 xxu| o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9780387339283
_99780387339283
024 7 _a10.1007/0387339280
_2doi
035 _avtls000331117
039 9 _a201509030712
_bVLOAD
_c201404120608
_dVLOAD
_c201404090348
_dVLOAD
_c201401311403
_dstaff
_y201401301202
_zstaff
040 _aMX-SnUAN
_bspa
_cMX-SnUAN
_erda
050 4 _aJF20-2112
100 1 _aLenard, Thomas M.
_eeditor.
_9300841
245 1 0 _aNet Neutrality or Net Neutering: Should Broadband Internet Services be Regulated /
_cedited by Thomas M. Lenard, Randolph J. May.
264 1 _aBoston, MA :
_bSpringer US,
_c2006.
300 _axii, 225 páginas,
_brecurso en línea.
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputadora
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso en línea
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
_2rda
500 _aSpringer eBooks
505 0 _aDistribution, Vertical Integration and the Net Neutrality Debate -- Network Neutrality and Competition Policy: A Complex Relationship -- Are “Dumb Pipe” Mandates Smart Public Policy? Vertical Integration, Net Neutrality, and the Network Layers Model -- The Importance of Open Networks in Sustaining the Digital Revolution -- Local Broadband Access: Primum Non Nocere or Primum Processi? A Property Rights Approach -- Open Access Arguments: Why Confidence is Misplaced.
520 _aThe subject of this book – whether or not to extend traditional telecommunications regulation to high-speed or "broadband" access to the Internet – is perhaps the most important issue now facing the Federal Communications Commission. The issue is also very contentious, with influential economic interests as well as academics on both sides of the question. Content providers – Microsoft and Amazon, for instance – argue that broadband providers should be treated as common carriers, required to transmit all content in a nondiscriminatory way. The broadband providers – the telephone and cable companies – argue that no bottleneck monopoly exists to justify such regulation and that, if imposed, it would stifle development of the Internet. This volume consists of recently updated papers that were originally presented at a June 2003 conference held by the Progress and Freedom Foundation. The authors are among the top researchers in the field of telecommunications research. Thomas M. Lenard is Vice President for Research and Senior Fellow at the Progress & Freedom Foundation. He is the author or coauthor of numerous books and articles on electricity, antitrust, privacy, and other regulatory issues. Lenard received his B.A. from the University of Wisconsin and his Ph.D. from Brown University. Randolph J. May is Senior Fellow and Director of Communications Policy Studies at the Progress & Freedom Foundation. In addition to writing a regular column for Legal Times, he has published more than fifty articles and essays on a wide variety of topics ranging from communications to law to constitutional theory. May received his A.B. from Duke University and his J.D. from Duke Law School.
590 _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
700 1 _aMay, Randolph J.
_eeditor.
_9300842
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea)
_9299170
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9780387339290
856 4 0 _uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33928-0
_zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942 _c14
999 _c277774
_d277774