000			03327nam a22003615i 4500
001			280000
003			MX-SnUAN
005			20160429154006.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			150903s2007 xxu| o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9780387464046 _99780387464046
024	7		_a10.1007/0387464042 _2doi
035			_avtls000331502
039		9	_a201509030721 _bVLOAD _c201404120629 _dVLOAD _c201404090409 _dVLOAD _c201401311417 _dstaff _y201401301211 _zstaff
040			_aMX-SnUAN _bspa _cMX-SnUAN _erda
050		4	_aHV6001-7220.5
100	1		_aPeršak, Nina. _eautor _9304628
245	1	0	_aCriminalising Harmful Conduct : _bThe Harm Principle, its Limits and Continental Counterparts / _cby Nina Peršak.
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bSpringer New York, _c2007.
300			_axv, 153 páginas, _brecurso en línea.
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF _2rda
500			_aSpringer eBooks
505	0		_aCriminalisation -- Grounds for (Principles of) Criminalisation -- Harm Principle – A Comparative Analysis -- Continental Counterparts to the Anglo-American Concept of the Harm Principle -- Conclusion – Final Evaluation -- Some Criminological Afterthoughts.
520			_aWhat are the limits to criminalisation? Is insult harmful or just offensive? What is wrong with criminalising disrespect to state symbols? Should criminal codes be moral codes? Criminalising Harmful Conduct addresses the issue of legitimate criminalisation in a modern liberal society. It argues that criminalisation, as one of the most intrusive state interventions into the autonomous sphere of the individual, should be limited by normative principles, defining the substance of what can be legitimately proscribed. In part, it is a comparative study between two major criminal legal systems (its theories), the Anglo-American, on one side, and the Continental criminal legal system of Germanic legal circle, on the other. Moreover, the book explores a model structure of the ideal criminalisation in respect of the principles and other criteria that should be followed to render the outcome justifiable. The model‘s central element is the Anglo-American principle called the ‘harm principle’, which is elaborated upon, its main elements (particularly ‘harm’) and functions analysed, and some controversial open questions tackled. Further limits on the harm principle are proposed. An in-depth analysis of four Continental legal concepts, which would on the face of it seem as counterparts to the harm principle, reveals that the overlap is not complete. The concept of ‘legal good’ shows the most potential and is thus examined in more detail. As it might be desirable to adopt the harm principle in the Continent, some practical ideas on how to achieve that are also mentioned.
590			_aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea) _9299170
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9780387464039
856	4	0	_uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-46404-2 _zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942			_c14
999			_c280000 _d280000