000 03491nam a22003735i 4500
001 281186
003 MX-SnUAN
005 20170705134205.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150903s2006 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9781402042096
_99781402042096
024 7 _a10.1007/1402042094
_2doi
035 _avtls000334671
039 9 _a201509030220
_bVLOAD
_c201404120829
_dVLOAD
_c201404090608
_dVLOAD
_y201402041154
_zstaff
040 _aMX-SnUAN
_bspa
_cMX-SnUAN
_erda
050 4 _aK201-487
100 1 _aCASALS, NEUS TORBISCO.
_eeditor.
_9306662
245 1 0 _aGroup Rights as Human Rights /
_cedited by NEUS TORBISCO CASALS.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands,
_c2006.
300 _axv, 263 páginas
_brecurso en línea.
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputadora
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso en línea
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aLaw and Philosophy Library,
_x1572-4395 ;
_v75
500 _aSpringer eBooks
505 0 _aCultural Minorities and Group Rights: Contested Concepts -- Towards an Alternative Notion of Group Rights -- Understanding Multiculturalism: Which Groups Qualify -- Tolerance, Neutrality and Group Rights -- On the Relevance of Cultural Belonging: Group Rights as Instrumental Rights and as Fundamental Rights -- Multiculturalism, Ethnic Minorities and the Limits of Cultural Diversity.
520 _aLiberal theories have long insisted that cultural diversity in democratic societies can be accommodated through classical liberal tools, in particular through individual rights, and they have often rejected the claims of cultural minorities for group rights as illiberal. Group Rights as Human Rights argues that such a rejection is misguided. Based on a thorough analysis of the concept of group rights, it proposes to overcome the dominant dichotomy between "individual" human rights and "collective" group rights by recognizing that group rights also serve individual interests. It also challenges the claim that group rights, so understood, conflict with the liberal principle of neutrality; on the contrary, these rights help realize the neutrality ideal as they counter cultural biases that exist in Western states. Group rights deserve to be classified as human rights because they respond to fundamental, and morally important, human interests. Reading the theories of Will Kymlicka and Charles Taylor as complementary rather than opposed, Group Rights as Human Rights sees group rights as anchored both in the value of cultural belonging for the development of individual autonomy and in each person’s need for a recognition of her identity. This double foundation has important consequences for the scope of group rights: it highlights their potential not only in dealing with national minorities but also with immigrant groups; and it allows to determine how far such rights should also benefit illiberal groups. Participation, not intervention, should here be the guiding principle if group rights are to realize the liberal promise.
590 _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea)
_9299170
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9781402042089
856 4 0 _uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4209-4
_zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942 _c14
999 _c281186
_d281186