000			03845nam a22003735i 4500
001			281275
003			MX-SnUAN
005			20160429154058.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			150903s2005 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781402037030 _99781402037030
024	7		_a10.1007/1402037031 _2doi
035			_avtls000334461
039		9	_a201509030207 _bVLOAD _c201404120752 _dVLOAD _c201404090531 _dVLOAD _y201402041149 _zstaff
040			_aMX-SnUAN _bspa _cMX-SnUAN _erda
100	1		_aAnstey, Peter R. _eeditor. _9306826
245	1	4	_aThe Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century : _bPatterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy / _cedited by Peter R. Anstey, John A. Schuster.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2005.
300			_axii, 248 páginas _brecurso en línea.
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, _x0929-6425 ; _v19
500			_aSpringer eBooks
505	0		_aThe Onset of the Scientific Revolution -- ‘Waterworld’: Descartes’ Vortical Celestial Mechanics -- Circular Argument -- From Mechanics to Mechanism -- The Autonomy of Natural Philosophy -- Physico-Theology and the Mixed Sciences -- The Saturn Problem -- Experimental Versus Speculative Natural Philosophy.
520			_aThe seventeenth century marked a critical phase in the emergence of modern science. But we misunderstand this process, if we assume that seventeenth-century modes of natural inquiry were identical to the highly specialised, professionalised and ever proliferating family of modern sciences practised today. In early modern Europe the central category for the study of nature was ‘natural philosophy’, or as Robert Hooke called it in his Micrographia, the Science of Nature. In this discipline general theories of matter, cause, cosmology and method were devised, debated and positioned in relation to superior disciplines, such as theology; cognate disciplines, such as mathematics and ethics; and subordinate disciplines, such as the ‘mixed mathematical sciences’ of astronomy, optics and mechanics. Thus, the ‘Scientific Revolution’ of the Seventeenth Century did not witness the sudden birth of ‘modern science’ but rather conflict and change in the field of natural philosophy: Aristotelian natural philosophy was challenged and displaced, as thinkers competed to redefine natural philosophy and its relations to the superior, cognate and subordinate disciplines. From this process the more modern looking disciplines of natural science emerged, and the idea of a general Science of Nature suffered a slow demise. The papers in this collection focus on patterns of change in natural philosophy in the seventeenth century, aiming to encourage the use and articulation of this category in the historiography of science. The volume is intended for scholars and advanced students of early modern history of science, history of philosophy and intellectual history. Philosophers of science and sociologists of scientific knowledge concerned with historical issues will also find the volume of relevance. Above all, the volume is addressed to anyone interested in current debates about the origin and nature of modern science.
590			_aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
700	1		_aSchuster, John A. _eeditor. _9306827
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea) _9299170
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9781402036033
856	4	0	_uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3703-1 _zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942			_c14
999			_c281275 _d281275