000 03154nam a22003735i 4500
001 281333
003 MX-SnUAN
005 20160429154100.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150903s2006 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9781402038389
_99781402038389
024 7 _a10.1007/9781402038389
_2doi
035 _avtls000334520
039 9 _a201509030805
_bVLOAD
_c201404300254
_dVLOAD
_y201402041150
_zstaff
040 _aMX-SnUAN
_bspa
_cMX-SnUAN
_erda
050 4 _aB67
100 1 _aDilworth, Craig.
_eautor
_9306925
245 1 4 _aThe Metaphysics of Science-1 :
_bAn Account of Modern Science in Terms of Principles, Laws and Theories /
_cby Craig Dilworth.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands,
_c2006.
300 _axvI, 333 páginas
_brecurso en línea.
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputadora
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso en línea
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aBoston Studies in The Philosophy of Science,
_x0068-0346 ;
_v173
500 _aSpringer eBooks
505 0 _aEmpiricism Vs. Realism – The Perennial Debate In The Philosophy Of Science -- Fundamental And Refined Principles: The Core Of Modern Science -- Empirical Laws: The Supervention Of Experience -- Scientific Theories: Closing The Circle -- The Principle-Theory-Law Model Of Scientific Explanation -- The Social Sciences: A Consideration Of Economics -- Natural Kinds -- Probability And Confirmation -- Empiricism Vs. Realism Revisited -- Modern Science And The Future.
520 _aThe Metaphysics of Science provides a clear, well-founded conception of modern science, according to which its core consists of particular metaphysical principles. On this view, both the empirical and the theoretical aspects of science are the result of the attempt to apply these metaphysical principles to reality. There is a flexibility in the application of the principles, however, so that, in their scientific guise, they may come to be reformed over time through scientific revolutions. This approach to modern science provides a unified conception of the enterprise, explaining such of its various aspects as the principle of induction, the nature of scientific knowledge and scientific reduction, the fundamental difference between the natural and social sciences, and the role of essentialism with respect to natural kinds. Furthermore, it provides a resolution of the long-standing debate between empiricism and realism. In this regard, and in others, the view of science advanced in this work is not only novel, but constitutes an alternative that is superior to both the empirical-analytic and the sociology of knowledge approaches that are prevalent today.
590 _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea)
_9299170
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9781402038372
856 4 0 _uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3838-9
_zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942 _c14
999 _c281333
_d281333