000			03374nam a22003855i 4500
001			281738
003			MX-SnUAN
005			20160429154119.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			150903s2005 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781402033780 _99781402033780
024	7		_a10.1007/1402033788 _2doi
035			_avtls000334327
039		9	_a201509030245 _bVLOAD _c201404120728 _dVLOAD _c201404090508 _dVLOAD _y201402041145 _zstaff
040			_aMX-SnUAN _bspa _cMX-SnUAN _erda
050		4	_aB1-5802
100	1		_aGaukroger, S. _eautor _9307710
245	1	2	_aA Subtle and Mysterious Machine : _bThe Medical World of Walter Charleston (1619–1707) / _cby S. Gaukroger ; edited by Emily Booth.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2005.
300			_avii, 297 páginas _brecurso en línea.
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, _x0929-6425 ; _v18
500			_aSpringer eBooks
505	0		_aRewriting Walter Charleton: Physick and Natural Philosophy -- ’The Alembic of Our Pen’: Charleton’s Identity as a Physician -- ’The Animal Oeconomy’: Natural History (1659) in the Context of English Physiology -- ’The Republick of Letters’: Charleton’s Identity in the Royal Society & College of Physicians -- Enquiries Into Human Nature (1680): Charleton’s Anatomy and Physiology After the Royal Society -- Three Anatomic Lectures (1683): Ways of Knowing and the Anatomical Body -- Conclusions.
520			_aWalter Charleton (1619-1707) has been widely depicted as a natural philosopher whose intellectual career mirrored the intellectual ferment of the ‘scientific revolution’. Instead of viewing him as a barometer of intellectual change, I examine the previously unexplored question of his identity as a physician. Examining three of his vernacular medical texts, this volume considers Charleton’s thoughts on anatomy, physiology and the methods by which he sought to understand the invisible processes of the body. Although involved in many empirical investigations within the Royal Society, he did not give epistemic primacy to experimental findings, nor did he deliberately identify himself with the empirical methods associated with the ‘new science’. Instead Charleton presented himself as a scholarly eclectic, following a classical model of the self. Physicians needed to endorse both ancient and modern authorities, in order to attract and retain patients. I argue that Charleton’s circumstances as a practising physician resulted in the construction of an identity at variance with that widely associated with natural philosophers. The insights he can offer us into the world of seventeenth century physicians are highly significant and utterly fascinating.
590			_aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
700	1		_aBooth, Emily. _eeditor. _9307711
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea) _9299170
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9781402033773
856	4	0	_uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3378-8 _zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942			_c14
999			_c281738 _d281738