000 02765nam a22003735i 4500
001 283452
003 MX-SnUAN
005 20160429154236.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150903s2008 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9781402068997
_99781402068997
024 7 _a10.1007/9781402068997
_2doi
035 _avtls000335813
039 9 _a201509030816
_bVLOAD
_c201404300307
_dVLOAD
_y201402041333
_zstaff
040 _aMX-SnUAN
_bspa
_cMX-SnUAN
_erda
050 4 _aB67
100 1 _aBonk, Thomas.
_eautor
_9310973
245 1 0 _aUnderdetermination :
_bAn Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge /
_cby Thomas Bonk.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands,
_c2008.
300 _brecurso en línea.
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputadora
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso en línea
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ;
_v261
500 _aSpringer eBooks
505 0 _aA Humean Predicament? -- Underdetermination Issues in the Exact Sciences -- Rationality, Method, and Evidence -- Competing Truths -- Problems of Representation -- Underdetermination and Indeterminacy.
520 _aUnderdetermination. An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge is a wide-ranging study of the thesis that scientific theories are systematically "underdetermined" by the data they account for. This much-debated thesis is a thorn in the side of scientific realists and methodologists of science alike and of late has been vigorously attacked. After analyzing the epistemological and ontological ascpects of the controversy in detail, and reviewing pertinent logical facts and selected scientific cases, Bonk carefully examines the merits of arguments for and against the thesis. Along the way, he investigates methodological proposals and recent theories of confirmation, which promise to discriminate among observationally equivalent theories on evidential grounds. He explores sympathetically but critically W.V.Quine and H.Putnam’s arguments for the thesis, the relationship between indeterminacy and underdetermination, and possibilities for a conventionalist solution. This book is of interest to anyone working in philosophy of science, and to those interested in the philosophy of Quine.
590 _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea)
_9299170
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9781402068980
856 4 0 _uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6899-7
_zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942 _c14
999 _c283452
_d283452