000			03095nam a22003855i 4500
001			283487
003			MX-SnUAN
005			20160429154238.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			150903s2007 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781402061769 _99781402061769
024	7		_a10.1007/9781402061769 _2doi
035			_avtls000335508
039		9	_a201509030238 _bVLOAD _c201404300302 _dVLOAD _y201402041302 _zstaff
040			_aMX-SnUAN _bspa _cMX-SnUAN _erda
050		4	_aP291-298
100	1		_aDavies, William D. _eeditor. _9311029
245	1	0	_aNew Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising / _cedited by William D. Davies, Stanley Dubinsky.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2007.
300			_brecurso en línea.
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aStudies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, _x0924-4670 ; _v71
500			_aSpringer eBooks
505	0		_aNew Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising -- Looking Out Over the Horizon -- New Views of Raising -- Raising in DP Revisited -- The Late Development of Raising: What Children Seem to Think about Seem -- Raising of Major Arguments in Korean (and Japanese) -- Raising or Control in Greek -- Not Really ECM, not Exactly Control: The ‘Quasi-ECM’ Construction in Greek -- Control in Modern Greek: It's Another Good Move -- Finiteness and Control in Greek -- Control in Romance -- Moving Forward with Romanian Backward Control and Raising -- Agreement and Flotation in Partial and Inverse Partial Control Configurations -- Null Subjects in Brazilian Portuguese and Finnish: They are not Derived by Movement -- Extensions and Alternatives to the MTC -- On (Non-)Obligatory Control -- Control and Wh-infinitivals -- Control via Selection -- Movement-Resistant Aspects of Control.
520			_aRaising and control have figured in every comprehensive model of syntax for forty years. Recent renewed attention to them makes this collection a timely one. The contributions, representing some of the most exciting recent work, address many fundamental research questions. What beside the canonical constructions might be subject to raising or control analyses? What constructions traditionally treated as raising or control might not actually be so? What classes of control must be recognized? How do tense, agreement, or clausal completeness figure in their distribution? The chapters address these and other relevant issues, and bring new empirical data into focus.
590			_aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
700	1		_aDubinsky, Stanley. _eeditor. _9311030
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea) _9299170
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9781402061752
856	4	0	_uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6176-9 _zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942			_c14
999			_c283487 _d283487