000 | 03040nam a22003615i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 288403 | ||
003 | MX-SnUAN | ||
005 | 20160429154626.0 | ||
007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
008 | 150903s2013 xxu| o |||| 0|eng d | ||
020 |
_a9781461465379 _99781461465379 |
||
024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/9781461465379 _2doi |
|
035 | _avtls000341936 | ||
039 | 9 |
_a201509030342 _bVLOAD _c201405050236 _dVLOAD _y201402061113 _zstaff |
|
040 |
_aMX-SnUAN _bspa _cMX-SnUAN _erda |
||
050 | 4 | _aJA1-92 | |
100 | 1 |
_aHess, Steve. _eautor _9318102 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAuthoritarian Landscapes : _bPopular Mobilization and the Institutional Sources of Resilience in Nondemocracies / _cby Steve Hess. |
264 | 1 |
_aBoston, MA : _bSpringer US : _bImprint: Springer, _c2013. |
|
300 |
_ax, 244 páginas 7 ilustraciones _brecurso en línea. |
||
336 |
_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_aarchivo de texto _bPDF _2rda |
||
500 | _aSpringer eBooks | ||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- Authoritarian Landscapes -- Single-Party Regimes -- Taiwan -- China -- Personalist Regimes -- The Philippines -- Kazakhstan -- Conclusion -- Bibliography. . | |
520 | _aThe turbulent year of 2011 has brought the appearance of mass popular unrest and the collapse of long lived autocratic regimes in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and possibly Syria. The sudden and unanticipated fall of these regimes – often thought of as exemplars of authoritarian resilience - has brought much of the conventional wisdom on the durability and vulnerability of nondemocratic regimes into question. This book seeks to advance the existing literature by treating the autocratic state not as a unitary actor characterized by strength or weakness but rather as a structure or terrain that can alternatively inhibit or facilitate the appearance of national level forms of protests. In the mode of the Arab Spring, the color revolutions of the former Soviet Union, and the people power movement of the Philippines, such movements overcome the daunting impediments presented by autocrats, appeal to likeminded counterparts across society, and overwhelm the ability of regimes to maintain order. Conversely, in other settings, such as contemporary China, decentralized state structures provide an inhospitable environment for national-level protest, leading collective actors to opt for more local and parochial forms of contention. This outcome produces paradoxical situations, such as in the PRC, where protests are frequent but national-level mobilization and coordination is absent. | ||
590 | _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto. | ||
710 | 2 |
_aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea) _9299170 |
|
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iEdición impresa: _z9781461465362 |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6537-9 _zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL) |
942 | _c14 | ||
999 |
_c288403 _d288403 |