000			02961nam a22003735i 4500
001			292258
003			MX-SnUAN
005			20160429155012.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			150903s2014 gw | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319017990 _99783319017990
024	7		_a10.1007/9783319017990 _2doi
035			_avtls000346098
039		9	_a201509030912 _bVLOAD _c201405050329 _dVLOAD _y201402070849 _zstaff
040			_aMX-SnUAN _bspa _cMX-SnUAN _erda
050		4	_aBC1-199
100	1		_aTahin, Gábor. _eautor _9323899
245	1	0	_aHeuristic Strategies in the Speeches of Cicero / _cby Gábor Tahin.
264		1	_aCham : _bSpringer International Publishing : _bImprint: Springer, _c2014.
300			_axvI, 193 páginas _brecurso en línea.
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aArgumentation Library, _x1566-7650 ; _v23
500			_aSpringer eBooks
505	0		_aForeword -- Acknowledgement -- Table of Contents -- Preface.- Chapter 1 Introduction: The Problem of Analysis -- Chapter 3 The Origins of Heuristic Argumentation: Probable Arguments in Ancient Rhetoric -- Chapter 4 Cicero’s Models: Heuristic Arguments in the Greek Orators -- Chapter 5 Pro Flacco -- Chapter 6  Pro Sulla.- Chapter 7 Pro Murena.- Chapter 8 Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino -- Chapter 9 Pro Milone -- Chapter 10 Pro Cluentio -- Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index.
520			_aThis book introduces a new form of argumentative analysis: rhetorical heuremes. The method applies the concepts of heuristic thinking, probability, and contingency in order to develop a better understanding of complex arguments in classical oratory. A new theory is required because Greek and Roman rhetoric cannot provide detailed answers to problems of strategic argumentation in the analysis of speeches. Building on scholarship in Ciceronian oratory, this book moves beyond the extant terminology and employs a concept of heuristic reasoning derived from the psychology of decision making and mathematical problem solving. The author analyses selected passages from Cicero’s forensic speeches where arguments of probability are deployed, and shows that the Sophistic concept of probability can link ancient rhetoric and modern theories of argumentation. Six groups of heuremes are identified, each of which represents a form of probabilistic reasoning by which the orator plays upon the perception of the jurors.
590			_aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea) _9299170
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9783319017983
856	4	0	_uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01799-0 _zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942			_c14
999			_c292258 _d292258