000			03608nam a22003495i 4500
001			294622
003			MX-SnUAN
005			20160429155153.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			150903s2005 gw | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783540278832 _99783540278832
024	7		_a10.1007/3540278834 _2doi
035			_avtls000347053
039		9	_a201509030735 _bVLOAD _c201404121324 _dVLOAD _c201404091102 _dVLOAD _y201402070922 _zstaff
040			_aMX-SnUAN _bspa _cMX-SnUAN _erda
100	1		_aBankas, Ernest K. _eautor _9328322
245	1	4	_aThe State Immunity Controversy in International Law : _bPrivate Suits Against Sovereign States in Domestic Courts / _cby Ernest K. Bankas.
264		1	_aBerlin, Heidelberg : _bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg, _c2005.
300			_axvii, 541 páginas _brecurso en línea.
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF _2rda
500			_aSpringer eBooks
505	0		_aThe Historical Origins of the Concept of Absolute Immunity of States -- The Development of the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity: A Claim Against France Before American Courts and its Aftereffects -- The Rights and Immunities of States in Foreign Courts: A Study of Absolute Immunity of States -- The Changing Law of Sovereign Immunity in U.S. and U.K. Courts: A Look at the Restrictive Immunity Rule -- Private Suits Against African Countries in Foreign Courts -- The Practice of African States in the Matter of Jurisdictional Immunities of States: Is it Still Absolute Immunity or Restrictive Immunity -- A Look at the ILC Report on Jurisdictional Immunities of Foreign States and Their Property -- Sovereign States Before Foreign Courts: An Observation on Certain Unsettled or Lingering State Immunity Problems -- State Immunity and the Violation of International Law: Some Recent Developments in the Law of State Immunity -- The Acceptance of the Proposed UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, A Recent Development -- The Current State of the Law of Sovereign Immunity -- Conclusion: A Modest Proposal for Resolving the Sovereign Immunity Controversy.
520			_aThe author shows through a careful analysis of the law that restrictive immunity does not have vox populi in developing countries, and that it lacks usus. He also argues that forum law, i.e. the lex fori is a creature of sovereignty and between equals before the law, only what is understood and acknowledged as law among states must be applied in as much as the international legal system is horizontal. Furthermore, the state never acts as a juridical or natural person and, therefore, in logical terms, its functions cannot be divided into potere politico and persona civile, as a prelude to determine jurisdiction. The said Italian doctrine therefore is ex facie erroneous, and that a simple dichotomy between absolute immunity and restrictive immunity wholly predicated on the nature test alone would not be helpful in promoting justice. Hence, arbitration and comparative dominant theory are suggested instead in the resolution of this elusive problem.
590			_aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea) _9299170
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9783540256953
856	4	0	_uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27883-4 _zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942			_c14
999			_c294622 _d294622