000 03206nam a22003735i 4500
001 304893
003 MX-SnUAN
005 20160429155924.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150903s2012 gw | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783642319549
_99783642319549
024 7 _a10.1007/9783642319549
_2doi
035 _avtls000359814
039 9 _a201509031005
_bVLOAD
_c201405070250
_dVLOAD
_y201402201419
_zstaff
040 _aMX-SnUAN
_bspa
_cMX-SnUAN
_erda
050 4 _aQH301-705
100 1 _aBoniolo, Giovanni.
_eautor
_9307872
245 1 4 _aThe Art of Deliberating :
_bDemocracy, Deliberation and the Life Sciences between History and Theory /
_cby Giovanni Boniolo.
264 1 _aBerlin, Heidelberg :
_bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2012.
300 _axviii, 186 páginas 5 ilustraciones
_brecurso en línea.
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputadora
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso en línea
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,
_x2192-6255 ;
_v6
500 _aSpringer eBooks
505 0 _aDeliberation and democracy -- Plato was not so far wrong: recalling Athenian democracy -- A reappraisal of the Medieval approach will lead to excellent deliberators -- Beware of those who think they possess the truth! -- Let us learn how to deliberate before deliberating! Between ethics and biomedicine.
520 _aHow may citizens take part in moral and political decisions concerning the results obtained by the contemporary life sciences? Should they blindly follow skilled demagogues or false and deceptive leaders? Should they adhere to the voice of the majority, or should they take a different decisional path? Deliberative democracy answers these questions, but what is deliberative democracy? Can we really deliberate if we are completely ignorant of the relevant issue? What about ethical or political expertise, is it strictly necessary? Finally, and most significantly, can a deliberative process take place if we ignore the techniques governing it; that is, the techniques required to be minimally skilled in rational argumentation? Giovanni Boniolo goes back to the historical and theoretical foundations of deliberation showing us, with some irony, that deliberation is a matter of competence, and not just a matter of a right to decide.  His conclusion might not delight everyone: “anyone who is not sufficiently acquainted with the subject matter or lacks the sufficient deliberative competence ought not be admitted to deliberative discussions. This restriction makes both good deliberation and a proper deliberative democracy possible, otherwise debate degenerates into demagogy and hypocrisy”.  
590 _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea)
_9299170
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9783642319532
856 4 0 _uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31954-9
_zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942 _c14
999 _c304893
_d304893