000 03665nam a22003735i 4500
001 310502
003 MX-SnUAN
005 20160429160408.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150903s2009 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789048123629
_99789048123629
024 7 _a10.1007/9789048123629
_2doi
035 _avtls000365031
039 9 _a201509031052
_bVLOAD
_c201405070406
_dVLOAD
_y201402211242
_zstaff
040 _aMX-SnUAN
_bspa
_cMX-SnUAN
_erda
050 4 _aB67
100 1 _aChalmers, Alan.
_eautor
_9351304
245 1 4 _aThe Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone :
_bHow Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms /
_cby Alan Chalmers.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands,
_c2009.
300 _axii, 288 páginas 10 ilustraciones
_brecurso en línea.
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputadora
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso en línea
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ;
_v279
500 _aSpringer eBooks
505 0 _aAtomism: Science or Philosophy? -- Democritean Atomism -- How does Epicurus’s Garden Grow? -- Atomism in its Ancient Greek Perspective -- From the Ancient Greeks to the Dawn of Science -- Atomism, Experiment and the Mechanical Philosophy: The Work of Robert Boyle -- Newton’s Atomism and its Fate -- The Emergence of Modern Chemistry With No Debt to Atomism -- Dalton’s Atomism and its Creative Modification via Chemical Formulae -- From Avogadro to Cannizzaro: The Old Story -- Thermodynamics and the Kinetic Theory -- Experimental Contact with Molecules -- Experimental Contact with Electrons -- Atomism Vindicated?.
520 _aDrawing on the results of his own scholarly research as well as that of others the author offers, for the first time, a comprehensive and documented history of theories of the atom from Democritus to the twentieth century. This is not history for its own sake. By critically reflecting on the various versions of atomic theories of the past the author is able to grapple with the question of what sets scientific knowledge apart from other kinds of knowledge, philosophical knowledge in particular. He thereby engages historically with issues concerning the nature and status of scientific knowledge that were dealt with in a more abstract way in his What Is This Thing Called Science?, a book that has been a standard text in philosophy of science for three decades and which is available in nineteen languages. Speculations about the fundamental structure of matter from Democritus to the seventeenth-century mechanical philosophers and beyond are construed as categorically distinct from atomic theories amenable to experimental investigation and support and as contributing little to the latter from a historical point of view. The thesis will provoke historians and philosophers of science alike and will require a revision of a range of standard views in the history of science and philosophy. The book is key reading for students and scholars in History and Philosophy of Science and will be instructive for and provide a challenge to philosophers, historians and scientists more generally.
590 _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea)
_9299170
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9789048123612
856 4 0 _uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2362-9
_zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942 _c14
999 _c310502
_d310502