000 03002nam a22003735i 4500
001 312208
003 MX-SnUAN
005 20160429160536.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150903s2011 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789400717619
_99789400717619
024 7 _a10.1007/9789400717619
_2doi
035 _avtls000366658
039 9 _a201509030704
_bVLOAD
_c201405070430
_dVLOAD
_y201402251342
_zstaff
040 _aMX-SnUAN
_bspa
_cMX-SnUAN
_erda
050 4 _aP1-1091
100 1 _aBermejo Luque, Lilian.
_eautor
_9353750
245 1 0 _aGiving Reasons :
_bA Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory /
_cby Lilian Bermejo Luque.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands,
_c2011.
300 _axvI, 209 páginas
_brecurso en línea.
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputadora
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso en línea
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aArgumentation Library,
_x1566-7650 ;
_v20
500 _aSpringer eBooks
505 0 _aPreface -- I Argumentation and Its Study -- II Why Do We Need a New Theory of Argumentation? -- III Acts of Arguing -- IV The Logical Dimension of Argumentation -- V The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation -- VI The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation -- VII Argumentation Appraisal -- References.
520 _aThis book provides a new, linguistic approach to Argumentation Theory. Its main goal is to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powers. This model takes as its basis Speech Acts Theory in order to characterize argumentation as a second-order speech act complex. The result is a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretation, analysis and evaluation of arguments. This theory sheds light on the many faces of argumentative communication: verbal and non-verbal, monological and dialogical, literal and non-literal, ordinary and specialized. The book takes into consideration the major current comprehensive accounts of good argumentation (Perelman’s New Rhetoric, Pragma-dialectics, the ARG model, the Epistemic Approach) and shows that these accounts have fundamental weaknesses rooted in their instrumentalist conception of argumentation as an activity oriented to a goal external to itself. Furthermore, the author addresses some challenging meta-theoretical questions such as the justification problem for Argumentation Theory models and the relationship between reasoning and arguing.
590 _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea)
_9299170
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9789400717602
856 4 0 _uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9
_zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942 _c14
999 _c312208
_d312208