000 04025nam a22003855i 4500
001 313802
003 MX-SnUAN
005 20160429160717.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150903s2013 ne | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789400746701
_99789400746701
024 7 _a10.1007/9789400746701
_2doi
035 _avtls000367329
039 9 _a201509030713
_bVLOAD
_c201405070440
_dVLOAD
_y201402251617
_zstaff
040 _aMX-SnUAN
_bspa
_cMX-SnUAN
_erda
050 4 _aK201-487
100 1 _aDahlman, Christian.
_eeditor.
_9356184
245 1 0 _aLegal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives /
_cedited by Christian Dahlman, Eveline Feteris.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2013.
300 _axii, 233 páginas 7 ilustraciones
_brecurso en línea.
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputadora
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso en línea
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aLaw and Philosophy Library,
_x1572-4395 ;
_v102
500 _aSpringer eBooks
505 0 _aTable of Contents -- Introduction; Christian Dahlman and Eveline Feteris -- Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions; Flavia Carbonell -- On the Argumentum ad Absurdum Statutory Interpretation: its Uses and Normative Significance; Thomas Bustamante -- Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy; Frederick Schauer -- Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments; Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav and Lena Wahlberg -- The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion; Harm Kloosterhuis -- Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”; Eveline Feteris -- Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal Norms; Carlos Bernal -- Weighing and Balancing in the Light of Deliberation and Expression; Bruce Anderson -- Construction or reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law; Jaap Hage -- The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification; Marko Novak -- Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive Interpretation; Antonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi -- Is Balancing a Method of Rational Justification sui generis?; Jan Sieckmann -- Arguing on Facts. Truth, Trials and Adversary Procedures.; Giovanni Tuzet -- Index.
520 _aThis book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence. It presents an overview of contributions representative of different academic and legal cultures, and different continents and countries. The book contains contributions on strategic maneuvering, argumentum ad absurdum, argumentum ad hominem, consequentialist argumentation, weighing and balancing, the relation between legal argumentation and truth, the distinction between the context of discovery and context of justification, and the role of constitutive and regulative rules in legal argumentation. It is based on a selection of papers that were presented in the special workshop on Legal Argumentation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany.
590 _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto.
700 1 _aFeteris, Eveline.
_eeditor.
_9356185
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea)
_9299170
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9789400746695
856 4 0 _uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1
_zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL)
942 _c14
999 _c313802
_d313802