000 | 05884nam a22003495i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 321699 | ||
003 | MX-SnUAN | ||
005 | 20160429161511.0 | ||
007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
008 | 160111s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
020 |
_a9783319232829 _9978-3-319-23282-9 |
||
035 | _avtls000422393 | ||
039 | 9 |
_y201601111024 _zstaff |
|
050 | 4 | _aB53 | |
100 | 1 |
_aLucivero, Federica, _eautor. _9366756 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEthical assessments of emerging technologies : _bappraising the moral plausibility of technological visions / _cFederica Lucivero. |
250 | _a1st ed. 2016. | ||
264 | 1 |
_aCham : _bSpringer International Publishing : _bSpringer, _c2016. |
|
300 |
_axix, 202 páginas : _b6 ilustraciones, 4 ilustraciones en color. |
||
336 |
_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_aarchivo de texto _bPDF _2rda |
||
490 | 0 |
_aThe International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, _x1875-0044 ; _v15 |
|
500 | _aSpringer eBooks | ||
505 | 0 | _aPART 1 -- Chapter 1: Democratic appraisals of future technologies: integrating ethics in Technology assessment -- 1.1 Appraising emerging technologies -- 1.2 From the myth to the history: the evolving social mandate of Technology Assessment -- 1.3 “Institutional” ethics of technology -- 1.3.1 Ethical bodies and the regulation of biomedical research -- 1.3.2 Normative evaluation of emerging technologies and advise to policy-makers -- 1.3.3 Outsourcing ethical reflection -- 1.4 Limitations in traditions assessing technologies -- 1.4.1 The normative deficit in TA -- 1.4.2 The technological and sociological deficit in institutional ethics -- 1.5 The need for integrating ethical inquiry in TA -- 1.6 Between grounding and exploring: the contribution of this study -- Chapter 2: Promises, expectations and visions: on appraising the plausibility of socio-technical futures -- 2.1 Expecting future science and technologies -- 2.2 The social construction of the future -- 2.3 The guiding normativity in technological visions -- 2.4 Beyond an instrumentalist view: technology and morality -- 2.5 Analyzing expectations’ plausibility: a proposal -- 2.5.1 Desirability vs Plausibility -- 2.5.2 Breaking down the plausibility question -- 2.5.3 In search of plausibility -- 2.5.4 Three strategies to appraise plausible visions -- PART 2 -- Chapter 3: The mechanism in the pill. From abstract images to detailed descriptions -- 3.1 Visions of promising technologies: the Nanopil -- 3.2 Promises of emerging artifacts -- 3.3 Rhetoric and black-boxes -- 3.4 A note on methods -- 3.5 The Nanopil: tales of an emerging object -- 3.5.1 From an idea to a project -- 3.5.2 An idealized system and its building-blocks -- 3.5.3 The functional components and their material conditions -- 3.6 From the lab “details” back to the big picture -- Appendix -- Chapter 4: The doctor in the pill. From “technical” details to social practices -- 4.1 Expectations of artifacts in use -- 4.2 (Fictive) scripts and actor-worlds -- 4.3 Research design -- 4.4 The Nanopill: tales of an emerging practice -- 4.4.1 Nanopil designers-world -- 4.4.2 Comparing actors’ worlds: current screening practice and future trends -- 4.4.3 Users’ preference and resistance -- 4. 5 Conclusions -- Chapter 5: The good in the pill. Assessing the plausibility of visions of desirable worlds -- 5.1 Visions of desirable worlds -- 5.2 Different expected artifacts and different values -- 5.3 Plurality of values among actors -- 5.4 Impacts of technologies and the moral landscape -- 5.4.1 Mediation -- 5.4.2 The co-production of technology and morality -- 5.5 Conclusion -- PART 3 -- Chapter 6: Expecting diagnostics, diagnosing expectations. The plausibility framework in use -- 6.1 Immunosignatures and the healthcare revolution -- 6.2 Research design -- 6.3 Immunosignatures: a “simple” concept -- 6.3.1 Reconstructing the history of the concept -- 6.3.2 Concepts and components in research practice -- 6.3.3 Some conditions for ImSg to work -- 6.4 The expected context of use -- 6.4.1 The many applications of ImSg -- 6.4.2 Assessing and enriching fictive scripts from situated perspectives -- 6.5 Immunosignatures and a desirable world -- 6.5.1 Articulating moral connotations in different technological platforms -- 6.5.2 Stakeholders and normative divergence -- 6.5.3 The interactions between ImSg and morality -- 6.6 Discussion -- Appendix -- Chapter 7: Scenarios as “grounded explorations” -- Designing tools for discussing the desirability of emerging technologies -- 7.1 In search of a normative framework -- 7.1.2 Democratic deliberation as a normative ideal: a pragmatist approach -- 7.1.2 Triggering moral imagination -- 7.2 Scenarios as tools to foster moral imagination -- 7.3 Plausible scenarios for “grounded explorations” -- 7.4 Techno-moral vignettes and scenarios in action -- 7.4.1 Immunosignatures Workshop -- 7.4.2 Workshop on the Nanopil -- 7.5 Discussion -- References -- Appendix: Techno-ethical scenarios and techno-moral vignettes -- 1. Techno-ethical scenarios on Immunosignatures -- 2. Techno-moral vignettes on Nanopil -- Chapter 8: Building-blocks for ethical assessments of emerging technologies -- 8.1 Between “grounding” and “exploring” -- 8.2 Towards Ethical Assessments of Emerging Technologies -- 8.3 Ethical expertise? Interpreting and intervening -- 8.4 Open questions -- References. | |
590 | _aPara consulta fuera de la UANL se requiere clave de acceso remoto. | ||
710 | 2 |
_aSpringerLink (Servicio en línea) _9299170 |
|
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iEdición impresa: _z9783319232812 |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttp://remoto.dgb.uanl.mx/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23282-9 _zConectar a Springer E-Books (Para consulta externa se requiere previa autentificación en Biblioteca Digital UANL) |
942 | _c14 | ||
999 |
_c321699 _d321699 |